-
-
Landes, “Save the Children of Palestine”: Talk in LA on Al Durah
June 18, 2013 By Richard LandesI’ll be speaking in LA on the Al Durah affair, especially on its effects, the day before the French court’s decision. The title is meant both Read More » -
Haaretz to the world: “Us? Make an Error? The Day of Resurrection will come first!”
May 28, 2013 By Richard LandesIn his mea culpa, Shmuel Rosner talks about how he was one of the people I described as “attacking ferociously” the investigation set up by Yom Read More » -
The Place of Journalism in Palestinian Cognitive Warfare (Talk at AIS, Haifa, June 2012)
May 28, 2013 By Richard Landes[I thought I had posted this last year when I gave it, but find I haven't. So here it is, particularly relevant in light of the Read More » -
Al Durah (Lethal) Journalism Thrives at Open Zion: Al Durah Incited Hatred? Absurd!
May 27, 2013 By Richard LandesOne of the more interesting spectacles that has arisen since the Kuperwasser Report has been the range of reaction, which pretty much separates the lethal journalists Read More » -
Reporters Without Borders Comes to Enderlin’s Aid: The Smear Defense
May 26, 2013 By Richard LandesAmong the defenses of Enderlin’s Al Durah story comes from an organization that considers itself “Reporters without Borders,” a variant of “Doctors without Borders,” and a Read More »
-
-
-
w.w.wygart: I've done a little checking [a little], Bruno Stev »
-
Dionissis Mitropoulos: @ Wygart I don't know who this Stevens is, but »
-
w.w.wygart: Prof. Landes, what do you make of Bruno Stevens st »
-
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Heaven On Earth


In a bizarre way, I think this will work out for the best.
The PLO, aka Fatah, are without doubt every bit the terrorist thugs that Hamas are, with the only difference being the diplomatic cover provided to them by governments and media around the world. This candid admission by the West Bank and Gaza Arabs basically strips away that veil.
Political victory could hardly do anything to encourage terrorism by Hamas, as the PLO never once took any meaningful actions to constrain them.
Having committed to the political sphere, Hamas will now at some future point be subject to the judgement of voters — inevitably for the worse one would assume, taking for granted that these goons have no hope whatsoever of effectively administering the territories.
Fatah are also highly skilled at propaganda — especially the indoctrination of school children — but Hamas’ efforts are just ugly and crude. In time that might turn out to mean loosening of the psychological grip of terrorism.
And there exists the possibility that the voters themselves may eventually be chastened by the realisation that the consequences of this choice rests on their shoulders (for example the crutches are soon likely to be kicked out from their all-but-dead economy).
I have to admire your optimism. I am afraid this is nothing but a tragedy which, like other tragedies, will only turn to the good after causing much suffering all around.
granted stripping away the veil is good, but only if we don’t avert our eyes. my prediction? MSM will be finding ways of spinning these guys positive because, as a dear but hopelessly flakey leftist friend put it as she explained things would get better, “we have to hope for the best…” okay, hope for it, but don’t let that become a factor in analysis.
political victory can bring many bad things including sharia (see Pedro’s post above), and an even more pervasive form of child-abuse than we now have. unfortunately, things can get worse.
as for future votes, what makes you think they’ll occur? once hamas installs sharia, what on earth makes you think that they will allow the democratic process to interfere. these guys are scarcely veiled demopaths, who use democracy to destroy democracy. given how many dupes like Jimmy Carter are out there ready to whitewash them in the service of peace, what makes you think the unveiling will have any effect?
i don’t understand what you mean by “loosening the psychological grip of terrorism” — how could hamas’ takeover contribute to that?
chastened for sure. but powerless. ironically, it will be the proximity to israel and the war that hamas conducts which will eventually be their downfall. otherwise the population of the territories is now in a vice grip. they cannot free themselves. and that, ironically, is what happened to iraq and why they so resent our presence (those who do), because it is so hard to admit they couldn’t save themselves.
rl
I wouldn’t call it optimism.
My main point is, the PLO are such monsters — terror attacks to the limit of their paramilitary capabilities, a ‘legal’ system wherein people are shot by masked goons in the streets, an education/indoctrination system that would make any Communist or Fascist proud — how could Hamas possibly be worse than what already exists…?
they’re sloppy and incompetent and corrupt. hamas is disciplined and fervently fanatical. that makes a difference.
one of the responses i get when i compare the palestinian leadership to the nazis, is that they’re not nearly as efficient as the nazis. hamas is another story.
I think it says a lot about our expectations of Jesus. Nice oneWe really do learn so much in