A piece by Mohamed Buisier, a Libyan-American political activist, in the Wall Street Journal points out what should be obvious to everyone: The Arab League has no moral values.

Death in Darfur
By MOHAMED BUISIER
June 2, 2006; Page A18

Once again, the international community, and the U.N. in particular, is being shamed into acting to stop the massacres in Darfur, and once again the Arab League and Arab leaders are unwilling and unable to face facts, or to deal with them in a civilized and humane manner.

Indeed, the most recent Arab League summit, which took place in the Sudanese capital, Khartoum — presumably as a show of support to the host government — ended with a resolution denying that any massacres had taken place in Darfur and expressing resistance to any outside intervention in the “internal” affairs of an Arab country. (Not surprisingly, this stance is identical to that taken by Osama Bin Laden.)

The way to go: deny everything and scream about meddling by others.

By adopting this argument, the Arab League was not just covering up for the atrocities perpetrated by the Sudanese government, but also for the direct or indirect involvement in this part of the Sudan of some of the Arab governments attending the summit. It is but one more shameful manifestation of Arab governments turning a blind eye to the continuing inhumane atrocities committed against their own citizens.

It sheds an interesting light on the moral indignation that the Arab League expresses vis-à-vis the Israelis. Even if we discount for tribal loyalties (the Palestinians are also Arabs, so their suffering concerns them more), this is rank hypocrisy. Here we have Sudanese Arab Muslims actually committing genocide, and the same organization that denounces a fabricated genocide of Palestinians (who continue to grow in numbers all the time), cannot bring itself to say anything negative. Pure tribalism has no moral claims outside the tribe; and that is how we should treat Arab and Muslim moral claims on our conscience — null and void till they show commitment to those values.

The fact that the Arab League is ineffectual is no longer news. Indeed, it may even work to the advantage of those present at the summit that many of the delegates were asleep, as Al-Arabiya TV cameras showed: In the future, if justice were to prevail in Darfur, the conferees could claim that they were sleeping when the resolution was passed and blame the whole ugly episode there on a Western/Zionist conspiracy to destroy the image of Arabs and Muslims.

While not dwelling on the cause of the problem, other Muslim leaders, such as Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, have tried to raise awareness of the humanitarian tragedy that is taking place in Darfur. But such pleas should be directed at the Arab and Sudanese governments and not just at the international community, particularly as Sudan continues to oscillate between denying and allowing international access to Darfur. Sudan’s track record does not inspire confidence.

But why should anyone be surprised that the Arab League is denying yet one more massacre in its midst? In fact, some Arab leaders and so-called Arab intellectuals continue to assert that Saddam Hussein is still the legitimate president of Iraq even after his massacres of Iraqis have been unearthed. After all, for many decades now, legitimacy in this part of the world has been gained at the point of a gun (or for those diehard romantics in Western foreign ministries, by the sword).

For more on this, read Kanan Makiya’s devastating book on the moral failure of Arab intellectuals: Cruelty and Silence: War, Tyranny, Uprising, and the Arab World.

The contrast between the Arab League’s denial of any massacres in Darfur and the handover of Charles Taylor by the Nigerian government to the U.N.-backed special court in Sierra Leone is telling, to say the least. Taylor, who had received support from some members of the Arab League, will be the first African leader to face war-crimes charges.

It remains a serious concern that while many regions of the world are moving forward and finding, with the support of the international community, mechanisms to bring the likes of Chile’s Pinochet, Yugoslavia’s Milosevic and Liberia’s Taylor to justice, the Arab League’s denial of the atrocities in Darfur demonstrates not only disrespect for human life, but proof that the Arab world may be falling into a darkness of which we had only a glimpse in New York, Madrid and London.

May be falling? One of the salient features of the Arab world since 2000 has been the degree to which the darkness we have glimpsed in their attacks on the US and Europe invaded their media. It was already bad beforehand. But afterwards, the currency, intensity, and pervasiveness of conspiracy theory, demonization, and hate mongering metastasized. The sight of these Arab leaders sleeping while others articulate reprehensible propaganda offers us another insight into the banality of evil in the Arab world.

Can the Arab world hope for, and expect, a miracle from its warlord leaders and their heirs? Or is it condemned to a downward spiral in which cruel and autocratic leaders are replaced with even more barbarity?

The Arab world is in a race against time. Its leaders, for once, should stop and think if it is in their interest to continue governing by force, and instilling fear, hatred and a dangerous sense of impotence in their populations. It is time to break out of this culture of fear, wherein the rulers fear those they govern, and the people fear their rulers. Opening up the political space for democratic participation, and encouraging a more civilized dialogue between state and society based on respect for the rights of the individual, would be a step toward breaking this cycle of fear.

I’m not sure how this would work right now. My sense is that it will take a generation to prepare many of these populations for democracy, which is a difficult high-wire act, not an easy solution to the problem of tyranny (there are no easy solutions to that problem). Breaking out of the culture of fear takes a population that is, in a critical mass, willing to both trust and be trustworthy. That ain’t easy.

If the Arab League and Arab leaders cannot constrain or punish those in their midst who commit heinous atrocities against their own populations, they should not complain when the rest of the world acts to make this world a less welcoming place for those who are committing atrocities.

And so the rest of the world should, indeed, act. Too bad that our media and intellectuals spend so much time defending this with misplaced moral equivalence.