Political Correctness and the Rise of Islamism

Tough article by Amil Imani, an Iranian expatriot and apparently an ex-Muslim spares no delicate sentiments nor does he accept the standard distinction between Islamism and Islam. His comments on the issue of political correctness’ current counterproductive role and Islam’s danger describe the dynamic of demopaths and their dupes. It’s the same dynamic that makes the MSM major contributors to the success of Jihad in the 21st century.

Political Correctness is the Incubator of Islamism

by Amil Imani

14 Feb, 2007

Time and again we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a very small minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are the disaffected and the young. And not to worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.

With heavy assurances like this, coming from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without the aid of sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racist, alarmist hate mongers. Who is right?

Wouldn’t be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter, rather than blindly accepting either position? Of course it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor and time saving devices.

Yet, the Islam problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts, nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and it shows every sign of imposing itself on us. Let us look at some of the facts.

I wouldn’t call what follows “facts.” Observations, even accurate observations might be a better term. A lot of judgments involved, many of them seem to me quite sound. I must admit that even my fairly realistic mind rebels against the idea that Islam should disappear. But I’m working on the last chapter of my book on millennialism, on contemporary global Jihad as an apocalyptic millennial movement of the most dangerous kind — the kind that, when they “take,” end up killing tens of millions of people, like the Taiping, the Communists and the Nazis — and I’ve been reading the Qur’an. Hard to disagree with his observations, even though he makes Andrew Bostom look like a moderate.

  • * Not every Muslim wears an explosive vest ready to detonate in the midst of a crowd of innocent civilians, yet there are more volunteers for the mission than there are explosive vests. The Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, hasn’t even officially joined this form of jihad. Yet, by its own admission, it has over 10,000 volunteers trained ready to be deployed, and thousands more queuing to join in. This time around, the jihadists heading for Allah’s heaven might come fitted with nice little suitcases of dirty bombs instead of the bulky explosive vests. Recall that it took only 19 of these killers to launch the aerial mass murder of 9/11 that killed 3,000 people, shattered our open trusting way of life, and cost us billions of dollars.
  • * The jihadists are not confined to a minority of disaffected Muslim youth. How young are Bin Laden, his deputy doctor of death Al Zawahiri, mullah Omar of the Taliban, Khamenei and Refsanjani of Iran, just to name a few? How disaffected are they? Muhammad Ata, leader of the 19 airborne thugs and the decapitator of Wall Street Journal reporter Pearl were somewhat younger, yet well-healed and Western educated.
  • * Just coin some terms such as the “Melting Pot,” or “Multiculturalism” and you have the problem solved? Roll out the red carpet for the immigrant Muslims, treat them as you would your own citizens, give them stipends, medical care, and free education and they will integrate seamlessly into the society? No such thing at all. The idea of Melting Pot may work with people who come from different lands to make the new country their home. The Islamists, on the other hand, come with the belief that they already own the place and want to make it part of the Ummeh. Some forty percent of second and third generation Muslim Britons reject British democracy, express their allegiance to Islam and want to live under Sharia. So much for the Melting Pot comfort pill.
  • * The new Islamist arrivals take advantage of the provisions of the most benign system known to humanity, democracy, to implode it from within. Muslims, by sheer numbers, will soon be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They are already doing that in bits and pieces. They are imposing many of their values, in a number of societies, even while they are in the minority. Politicians, hungry for votes and devoted to the practice of political correctness bend backward to accede to Islamists’ demands.
  • * As for Multiculturalism, it is even more of a delusion than the Melting Pot myth. It is a second generation Comfort Pill. Since the Melting Pot proved to be worse than a placebo, the politically correct gave us the new pill. A glance at Europe shows how Multiculturalism in fact has served as the incubator of Islamism in no time at all. Europe’s Multiculturalism is rapidly birthing a Uniculturalism, if the Islamists’ medieval way of life can be dignified as a culture.
  • * Respect for diversity, separation of religion and state, freedom of belief and expression, are pillars of democracy, yet anathema to Islam. In no Islamic land do you find an ecumenical organization. It is only in non-Islamic countries that the shameless duplicitous Muslim, be he an imam, a mullah, or a regular run-of-the- mill faithful of Allah, meekly participates in ecumenical feel-good gatherings.
  • * To Muslims, no other religion is deemed worthy of recognition, much less accommodation. There is not a single church or synagogue or a Buddhist temple in all of Saudi Arabia. They are barred. The Islamic Republic of Iran’s raft of genocidal pogroms includes the heinous practice of bulldozing even the cemeteries of its Baha’i religious minority. The Islamic tyranny of the mullahs imprisons Christian Iranians for celebrating Christmas. Egypt denies its own citizens identity cards for refusing to lie and fake their religious belief or disbelief. The ID cards are required for education, securing work, receiving medical care and just about every right of citizenship. Without it, a citizen is literally subjected to slow death.
  • * In Islam only Muslim men, and, to a lesser extent, Muslim women, are entitled to certain rights. All non-Muslims, including the so-called people of the book, namely Christians and Jews, are at best second-class subject, subjects who must pay the back-breaking Jezyyeh, poll tax, for their “sin” of not converting to Islam. So, as Islam makes its inroads in new lands, as its membership swells through explosive birth and conversion, secular democracies will be inevitably replaced by Islamism with its stone-age Sharia laws. The best offer that Islam will make is to spare the non-Muslim’s life if he puts on the heavy yoke of Jezyyeh for the rest of his living days.
  • * Not to worry about the horrific things that are happening on the other side of the world? If Muslims act heinously toward non-Muslims, it is just the way things are in those countries and it is hardly any of our business? This is the same attitude that set Islamization of Europe on a seemingly irreversible track. One European country after another is rapidly buckling under the weight of Islamism.
  • * Most importantly, not to worry about Islamization of our country? After all, Muslims are about 6-7 million minority in a population of nearly 300 million, you reason? That even a smaller number of these Muslims are hothead radicals, while the majority is just like everyone else? But small minorities can overwhelm the majority by use of coercion and deadly force. Islamists are notorious for their dedication to the use of force for achieving their aims. The Taliban were a very small minority in Afghanistan, the Islamists were a tiny faction in the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran. Both overwhelmed the masses and imposed their reign of terror. The terrorist Hamas is also a “minority” in number, yet it rules the Palestinian Territory. Hizbollah of Lebanon is a minority, yet it has taken the country to the verge of destruction.
  • * Islamists are Islam’s locomotive that takes the wrecking-ball Islamic train on its demolition course. Islam and democracy are incompatible. As democracies practice their magnificent accommodating belief, they knowingly or unknowingly lay the track for the advancing wrecking train of Islam. We, in the United States of America must resist Islamism while it is still gathering momentum, unless we wish to end up in the same fix as the Europeans.
  • * We, in the United States, further need to embark on a comprehensive legal, educational, and social campaign to eradicate the deadly plague of Islam. By effective action, we even save those peaceful Muslims from their own affliction. I am not hatemongering. I would love to see all Muslims become ex-Muslims and full-fledged members of a diverse tolerant democratic society. It is a statement of fact about what Islam is. Islam is a highly communicable pandemic violent disease that demands urgent and serious containment.
  • Europe is already badly infected with Islamism. It is the coal-miners’ canary. It is telling us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and the lives of our children at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.

    Amil Imani is an Iranian born, pro-democracy activist who resides in the United States of America. He is a poet, writer, literary translator, novelist and an essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. Amil Imani’s Home Page

    COMMENT

    This is strong stuff, even by my standards, which I thought were pretty hardy. On the other hand, it may signal a change that deserves some anticipatory thinking. Has Europe begun to wake up? Are Muslims coming to the end of their free, politically-correct, moral-equivalenced, multi-cultural free ride? Are the days when all Muslims have to do is complain and the chattering classes run for cover? When one looks at the affair of the Carnaval float in Germany, one gets the sense that a) Europe’s waking up; b) a sense of humor is an excellent way to communicate; c) the sarcastic response of the Muslims — ‘The message it gives me is: ‘We [Germans] love our prejudices, we’ll stand up for them, even if they are flagrantly untrue.” — sound increasingly hollow. Flagrantly untrue? How’s that? Suicide bombers these days aren’t, almost to a man, Muslims.

    So what does that give us?

    A very volatile situation.

    If what some of us strongly suspect is right — that many of these “nice” Muslims who just want a fair shake and the respect due to them — are in fact demopaths with an Islamist agenda, then we can safely observe the following:
    1) they’re only nice because they’re winning in the MSM.
    2) if they stop winning in the MSM, they will get nastier.
    3) as the Islamist demopaths pretences are challenged, we can expect their patented “rage and indignation” at Islamophobia to turn more violent.
    After all this is why so many of “us” don’t want to out “them,” because if we do, we know deep down inside that they’ll get violent. That’s what appeasement is about.

    This will get a good deal nastier before it gets better. We need the steadiness to hold the course ahead.

    6 Responses to Political Correctness and the Rise of Islamism

    1. Lynne T says:

      Robert:

      If you are not in the habit of reviewing frontpagemag.com, there are a couple of interviews Jamie Glazov has conducted with Bill Warner of the Centre for the Study of Political Islam that are extremely interesting. The scholars behind CSPI posit that it is the dual nature of Political Islam that makes it a fundamentally hostile and lethal ideology.

      Interview I: The Study of Political Islam: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26769

      Interview II: The Infidel Revolution: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=27030

    2. Eliyahu says:

      it may be slightly off topic, but not much, to point to the compulsively “politically correct” religious operatives of the American Friends Service Committee [an outgrowth of the Quaker Church] and some Mennonites. A delegation of such traveled to Teheran to have a gooey, gushy dialogue with the mad mullahs. They learned that Islam is against weapons of mass destruction. The atomic bomb that Iran is working on is only meant to melt the ingredients that go into Turkish taffy. Beliefs to the contrary are simply a misunderstanding.
      http://www.thememriblog.org/blog_personal/en/701.htm
      delegation, which arrived Monday and will depart February 25, is led by the Mennonites and Quakers but includes members of a number of U.S. Christian denominations.

      The group was invited by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

      “We are here to build bridges of peace and security” between the people of Iran and the U.S., said Mary Ellen McNish, American Friends Service Committee secretary-general.

      McNish said that on their return to the U.S., they will “directly go to Washington and visit Congress to give a report” on Iranians’ desire for peace.

      After the delegation met with Tehran Friday Prayer Leader Mohammad Emami Kashani, McNish stated, “It was so moving to hear [that] Islam prohibits weapons of mass destruction.” She added that many people in the U.S. are fearful about Iran, and, of course, are inflamed by the media. “We want both sides to forgive each other,” she said.

    3. Seymour Paine says:

      Most importantly, not to worry about Islamization of our country? After all, Muslims are about 6-7 million minority in a population of nearly 300 million, you reason?

      I’m not sure how the numbers 6-7 million was decided upon. I think Pipes has far lower estimates. Knowing the Moslem propensity for lying, the numbers might be better in the 1.5-2 million range.

      I think the 6-7 million number is so Moslems can be on a par with Jews.

      Beyond that, and the somewhat overheaded tone, he’s really pretty mild, in my view.

      I believe they should be removed from the West as soon as possible.

    4. Kesher Talk says:

      MTW Conference – Monday, Panel 1

      Hertzliya, Israel, December 17-18, 2006. Home page for my posts and links to other sites about the conference. Monday, December 18 – The first panel discussed how to improve Israel’s response to media manipulation. I have some transcript from…

    5. igout says:

      I believe they should be removed from the West as soon as possible

      Yes, and how much longer can we afford to tip-toe past it?

    6. [...] other,” the underdog, no matter what the evidence? Is it a form of capitulation (appeasement disguised as magnanimity)? Is it anti-Zionism or some related variant of Judeophobia? Or need we be zero-sum about it? To [...]

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>