Palestinian Terrorists Weigh in on the American Elections

While this site does not support a particular presidential candidate, the following article from National Review Online is an interesting insight into the manner in which proponents of Jihadi totalitarianism relate to American democracy. They try to manipulate it to serve their own goals, often through our media. Here, it seems that they are under the impression that their comments will help their candidate of choice. The absurd reality that is created in the dysfunctional conjunction between the terrorist leaders and liberal democracy is elucidated when they speak of harming a presidential candidate whose views they do not share.

Terrorists Prefer Hillary
And they’d rather see Rudy dead than president.
By Deroy Murdock

Senator Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is gaining fans, even on the West Bank.

“I hope Hillary is elected in order to have the occasion to carry out all the promises she is giving regarding Iraq,” said Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a Palestinian terror group. “I hope also she will maintain her husband’s policies regarding Palestine and even develop that policy. President Clinton wanted to give the Palestinians 98 percent of the West Bank territories. I hope Hillary will move a step forward and will give the Palestinians all their rights. She has the chance to save the American nation and the Americans’ life.”

Senakreh and other top Islamo-fascists want Hillary in the Oval Office. These mass murders also have “gone negative.” They want GOP contender Rudy Giuliani dead.

“We see Hillary and other candidates are competing on who will withdraw from Iraq and who is guilty of supporting the Iraqi invasion,” said Abu Jihad, an Al Aqsa leader in Nablus. “This is a moment of glory for the revolutionary movements in the Arab world in general and for the Iraqi resistance movement specifically.”

Al Aqsa’s man in the northern West Bank, Nasser Abu Aziz, considered it “very good” that there are “voices like Hillary and others who are now attacking the Iraq invasion.”

Islamic Jihad’s Abu Ayman felt “emboldened” by Clinton’s demands that America retreat from Iraq. He said: “It is clear that it is the resistance operations of the mujahideen that have brought about these calls for withdrawal.”

“All Americans must vote Democrat,” insisted Jihad Jaara, an exiled Al Aqsa agent who commanded 2002’s siege of Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity.

Since 1995, these terrorists’ organizations have killed an estimated 162 and wounded 368 others in Israel. Aaron Klein, an Orthodox Jew who is’s Jerusalem bureau chief, interviewed some three dozen leading Muslim fanatics, including those quoted here. His new book, Schmoozing with Terrorists, details these chilling encounters with violent Islamic extremists in Israel’s Palestinian territories.

Klein boldly goes where few journalists have gone before. For one typical interview, he traverses an Israeli border checkpoint, takes a local Palestinian taxi to central Jenin, then waits for a white Ford Escort without license plates to whisk him to an apartment complex at the end of an alley. He then meets Islamic Jihad’s Abu Ahmed. After several minutes, Klein asks: “So, if after today’s meeting, you saw me in a café in Jerusalem that you were sent to attack, you’d still try to blow it up?”

“I will not hesitate to blow you up,” Ahmed responds. “Meanwhile, and before I drive you to Hell in an operation, enjoy your tea and our hospitality.”

Why do these hardened butchers have a soft spot for Hillary Clinton? Perhaps because the New York Democrat is soft on terrorism.

These terrorists’ love for Hillary mirrors their hatred for her leading GOP rival, Rudolph W. Giuliani.

“If I had the occasion to meet him I would hurt him,” said Ramadan Adassi, a West Bank Al Aqsa leader. “For the sake of the American people, Giuliani shouldn’t be elected. He is a disgusting guy, and I think Americans must think very hard about their future and their soldiers who will be killed when they come to elect their leaders.”

“Giuliani doesn’t deserve to live or even to be mentioned,” said Al Aqsa’s Ala Senakreh. “He hates Palestinians and we hate him.”

Al Aqsa’s Abu Hamed said Giuliani “can hate Arafat and the Palestinians, but he knows that nobody is hated in the world more than his leadership, his party, his president, and his Zionist friends.”

Why the hard feelings? Perhaps because Giuliani has snipped terrorists’ bomb wires for 31 years. “I don’t believe Americans should base their votes entirely on what the terrorists think,” Aaron Klein says from Jerusalem, “but it’s certainly telling that our enemies are rooting for the Democrats, particularly Hillary.” He adds: “The theme from all those interviewed in the book, about 35, and those I have talked with for my reporting the past few years, which adds many more, is the same: They favor the Democrats and believe the liberal ideology is their road to victory.”

As the War on Terror continues, Americans should study our foes’ political preferences — and then pull the lever the other way.

Closing comment by RL:

Well, I wouldn’t be so blunt. But it would be worthwhile if people who are voting democratic to get us out of Iraq would pause a few moments to think about why these folks are rooting for the Democrats. Is that, at heart, they’re true progressives and want a kind leader for America so they can finally respond in kind? Or is it because

    This is a moment of glory for the revolutionary movements in the Arab world in general and for the Iraqi resistance movement specifically.”

Which means, leave Iraq, and they’ll follow you home.

4 Responses to Palestinian Terrorists Weigh in on the American Elections

  1. Eliyahu says:

    RL, there were American liberal politicians once upon a time who were stronger than many a Republican in being willing to oppose tyrants by strong means, including force. Remember Henry Jackson? These words “liberal” & “conservative” may mean something more than the truly sinister “left-right” political spectrum notion, but not much more.

  2. fp says:

    if anybody believes that just because republicans talk tougher they “get” the islamist threat better or know or will do something about it, they are gravely mistaken. if american politicians are good at anything, they are good at talking, and even then the smart can see right through their empty words. when it comes to knowing and understanding the world, they’re all equally deficient.

    the idiot bush talked tough, but is now doing exactly what the islamists want him to do, complete with his wife covering her head and defending the “right” of women to be wrapped in sacks, just like pelosi did.

    they are all incompetent, ignorant and untrustworthy because that’s what the US political system produces and requires. had they been any different they wouldn’t have been candidates in the first place.

    the US has put itself into a position of accelerating decline and there is little that it politicians could do, even if they were competent, to stop the process, let alone when they are not.


  3. fp says:

    as to iraq, they will follow you home anyway, no matter what you do. iraq only made is easier, because it is destroying the military and the economy, drives up the price of oil to fill the coffers of saudia and iran so that they can fund the jihad, it prvides jihad field training and experience, allows other powers — china, russia india — to develop while the US is bogged down and deteriorating in all sorts of ways — and instead of letting shiites and sunnis kill each other, it prevents it freeing them both to focus on the west.

    in short, the stupidity and incompetence has reached suicidal levels and is irreversible.

  4. fp says:

    heh, heh. so quickly i got evidence for what i just stated:

    More on Giuliani’s Advisors

    These people are so damn predictable and contemptible, it hurts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *