Daily Freep Article on My Work

I mentioned the article about my work on Pallywood and Al Durah. Here it is. Aside from some slight incoherences, it seems fair. I append the two comments by students.

A look at Mideast propaganda
Matt Kaplan

Issue date: 4/10/08 Section: News

A banner [shown in a power point presentation] at the Newton Public Library bore the Star of David, and equated the symbol of Judaism to a swastika and a slain Palestinian child to make a strong statement about the growing conflict in the Middle East and how some Westerners may be deceived by Palestinian propaganda.

Boston University College of Arts and Sciences professor Richard Landes spoke a week ago about symbolism in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and about Muhammad al-Durah, a Palestinian boy who was allegedly killed by Israeli troops in late 2000 to trigger anti-Israel sentiment in Europe. Landes said he does not think Israelis killed al-Durah – he said Palestinians staged the boy’s death for cameras through a medium known as “Pallywood.”

Landes coined the term “Pallywood” to mean systematic Palestinian attempt to stage scenes for Western cameras, effectively serving as anti-Israeli propaganda for the Western press, he said.

“This was run as news and seized upon by a world anxious for nasty stuff about Israel,” Landes told attendees.

Landes said after the speech that in two hours of propaganda footage, “the best we got is a fake ambulance scene.”

Landes founded the Center for Millennial Studies in 1996, a BU organization dedicated to studying the millennium and its impact on apocalyptic thought, which he said surrounds claims of radical Islam.

Jack Schuss, a member of the Boston Israel Action Committee, which sponsored the lecture, said he thinks Landes’s thoughts on the subject of Palestinian and Israeli conflict are noteworthy.

“On the subject he’s very knowledgeable” he said.

Andrew Gow, a University of Alberta history professor, said he met Landes at the first conference for millennial studies in 1996.

“This is a guy with enormous insight and intuition,” Gow said. “[His] eagle eye pierces to the core of the matter. His ideas are often utterly original. He’s willing to pursue a question because he’s curious about it.”

Landes goes against established precedent by asking new and oftentimes controversial questions using techniques shunned by tradition historians, Gow said.

“I think his work is controversial. I think the establishment doesn’t like it,” Gow said. “They’re objecting as much to the conclusions as to his methods.”

Although trained as a medieval historian, Landes uses skills honed as a historian in his analysis for Pallywood, Gow said. Historians need to detect abnormalities inside and outside a text to determine its authenticity, and Landes has applied this skill towards raw video footage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Gow said.

Landes has analyzed select, raw footage of clashes between Palestinians and Israelis and discovered that, as outlined in his 2003 movie Pallywood, Palestinians sometimes stage scenes in front of Western cameras to deceive Western audiences into being more sympathetic toward their cause, Landes said.

Landes said he thinks the mainstream media disseminates one-sided news coverage because of a fear of angering Palestinians and jihadist Muslims, and because they want to help people they feel are oppressed.

In his presentation at the Newton Library, Landes detailed his evidence and said he thinks the al-Durah incident was staged, and the incident sparked anti-Israel and anti-Semitic sentiments in France.

“There is no cost to saying nasty things about the Israelis,” Landes said. “You say something bad about the Palestinians and the best you can hope for is to not be let back in . . . You have this masochistic postmodern narrative where we are guilty.”

Here are the comments.

Aaron Larocque
posted 4/10/08 @ 12:35 PM EST
This is a bit biased. Israel seems to do the same thing when an Israeli boy gets killed, but they retaliate with great military force. Recently a prominent Rabbi in Israel has been quoted “The Talmud states that if gentiles rob Israel of silver they will pay it back in gold, and all that is taken will be paid back in folds, but in cases like these there is nothing to pay back, since as I said – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs,” added Rabbi Eliyahu. Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert has also been quoted saying that if radicalists in Palestine continue attacking, they will face a “shoah,” which is the Hebrew word that refers to a holocaust. Israel’s deputy defence minister Matan Vilnai told Army Radio: “The more Qassam fire intensifies and the rockets reach a longer range, they will bring upon themselves a bigger ‘shoah’ because we will use all our might to defend ourselves.” The anti-Israel sentiment is not without basis, and westerners are deceived if they think that Israel is doing no wrong.

George Viglirolo
posted 4/13/08 @ 2:55 PM EST
According to Matt Kaplan’s narrow “Look at Mideast Propaganda” (DFP, 10 April 2008), Professor Landes “thinks the mainstream media disseminates one-sided news coverage because of a fear of angering Palestinians and jihadist Muslims.” Others would argue that one-sided news coverage is of quite a different sort — one that stems directly from the very legitimate fear of being labeled anti-Semitic.

The truth is that there has never been, in the U.S. at least, an open, honest, objective discussion–either in the political halls of power, or in the local and national press–of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. It would surely be more than an academic exercise to examine scrupulously what each side has suffered.

Note that neither of them confront either my argument or the evidence.

12 Responses to Daily Freep Article on My Work

  1. oao says:

    There is no better evidence to validate your argument about the media than the two comments.

    oao
    http://fallofknowledgeandreason.blogspot.com/

  2. [...] Augean Stables added an interesting post on Daily Freep Article on My WorkHere’s a small excerpt [...]

  3. Vince P says:

    I left this comment on the site:

    This will be fun to watch. All the Israel-haters will dazzle us with their uncanny ablity to bypass all the points raised in the article and instead unleash their list of indictment against Western Civilization and George Bush.

    And George Viglirolo,who cares what “others would argue”.. There are people who will argue anything, no matter how fantasical.

  4. oao says:

    Viglirolo reveals one of the characteristics of what western society produces today: they who don’t need any knowledge and cannot think for themselves critically and independently. rather, they seek to conform.

    oao
    http://fallofknowledgeandreason.blogspot.com/

  5. Eliyahu says:

    Larocque & Viglirolo disreagard the nearly 2 millenia of Western Judeophobia. Just when did Judeophobic disappear so that fear of being called “antisemitic” became a dominant motives, rather than finding more sophisticated ways to express the same old Judeophobia. They also seem ignorant of Muslim prejudice towards unbelievers, kuffar, and towards Jews in particular.

  6. oao says:

    ignorance. it’s the root of much of the decline of the west.

  7. [...] a problem with a group, …http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2008-04-13-teacher-yucuis_N.htmDaily Freep Article on My Work I mentioned the article about my work on Pallywood and Al Durah. Here it is. Aside from some slight [...]

  8. diane says:

    Richard,

    And now that you’ve allowed yourself to be outed by this jumbled article in the student paper, what (if anything) do your colleagues say?

  9. oao says:

    my guess is that they won’t say anything. rather, consequences, if any, will be discerned in the routine operations of the department/school that touch RL.

  10. Richard, I certainly look at demonstrations portrayed by television news differently, because of your analysis of Pollywood. I recently watched New Footage of a Green Peace demonstration at an Airport. What struck me was that the ostensive issue was a relatively trivial one, but the issue allowed the green peace demonstrators to be recorded on tv taps that wee later seen all over the world. The demonstrators were climbing over ai planes, and this appeared to be stunts for the camera, that would make the evening news. It occurred to me that this was a money raising event. A means of bringing green peace to the attention of potential sources of money.

    Why did TV networks cooperate with this stunt? Wasn’t it because the footage increased the excitement level on the evening news? More people will watch, hence increased advertising income. Hence Green
    peace markets its demonstration to TV. TV markets it to consumers. Advertisers pay for the consumers eyes, and Green Peace gets paid by donations from viewers who enjoyed the show and thought Green Peace should be rewarded for putting it on.

    Keep up the good work.

  11. Ben says:

    One may note that the 1:1000 value ratio between yeshiva boys and arabs is in fact real and established by the Arabs.

    When the Arabs propose prisoner exchanges, they always expect the Israels to accept just one Israeli in exchange for hundreds or thousands of Arabs. Sometimes, they expect Israel to pony up hundreds of live Arabs just for Israeli body parts.

    If Arabs valued Arabs as equal to Israelis, they would propose 1 for 1 swaps. Instead, they beleive that the 1 Israeli they hold is worth far, far more and bargain accordingly.

    So we cannot blame a rabbi for this belief, it is clearly of Arab origin.

    Ben

  12. oao says:

    ben,

    somebody ought to have pointed this out to jimmah when he gave the 1 jew to 30/40 pal death ratio (which he pulled out of his behind).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>