[...] Zona InGame :: Noticias, videos, juegos y actualidad de PlayStation 3, Wii, Xbox360, Pc wrote an interesting post today on France2 Rushes (18 Minutes Version) Now Up at YouTubeHere’s a quick excerptLots to see, even thought they cut out at least three of the most obvious fake scenes. [...]
One of the most striking things about this scene is utter lack of purpose. All of these lads are running around without direction, shrieking without sense, and throwing stones without target.
This is less political protest than mass hysteria.
These lads are by now adults. That bodes ill for any kind of rational future for their society.
One of the things that one ought to wonder about is why the loving, devoted father is next to the wall, rather than the boy Muhammad next to the wall, if the father wants to protect him.
Another thing is why the father took the boy through that intersection where shooting and death were supposedly going on. If a whole large crowd was running around screaming, why couldn’t the father have gotten himself and the kid away from there if the other “youths” were able to get away? I recall hearing on the Israeli radio [Reshet Beyt] on the day of the alleged incident that the father was taking the boy to look at used cars that day. But why a route through such an ostensibly dangerous intersection??
By the way, one of the young men interviewed demonstrated once again that these Arabs see themselves as part of a larger Arab and Islamic identity. Towards the end of the first film, a fellow is interviewed in Arabic. I didn’t understand all of it, but I heard repeatedly refer to 1) sha`ab filastini, 2) al-sha`ab al-`Arabi [& al-ummah al-`Arabiyyah], and al-ummah al-Islamiyyah [or al-muslimiyyah]. No. 1 means the “palestinian people,” no. 2 means the Arab people [sha`ab] and the Arab nation [ummah], and no. 3 the Islamic nation or Muslim nation. So it is clear that he saw himself as part of the palestinian section of the Arab nation and the Islamic nation, concentric circles, as it were. But we ought to bear in mind that the Western MSM eat this stuff up, either because it fits their political program or because it fits their prejudices or both.
This is less political protest than mass hysteria. These lads are by now adults. That bodes ill for any kind of rational future for their society.
Yes, but apparently that does not prevent the west from interpretting it as protest and resistance. Their rationale is not to build themselves a society — they have no clue what that is and they dk how — it is is to fool the gullible idiots in the west and destroy israel’s.
Another thing is why the father took the boy through that intersection where shooting and death were supposedly going on.
I assume this is a rhetorical question. For the arabs explicitly say that they are proud to send their children to die for allah killing jews, surely what al-Durah did was quite protective.
So it is clear that he saw himself as part of the palestinian section of the Arab nation and the Islamic nation, concentric circles, as it were.
What else, given that this is what they are fed since kindergarten 24 hours a day, to distract them from the real source of their misery?
But we ought to bear in mind that the Western MSM eat this stuff up, either because it fits their political program or because it fits their prejudices or both.
I reiterate: the west has decided to sacrifice the jews in order to sate rising islam. But they are only wheting its appetite.
I couldn’t help but notice that with all the supposed gunfire, nobody sought to take cover. I also assume that members of the IDF are fairly accurate shooters, then how come with so many available targets none of the demonstrators suffered a single gunshot wound? This was just theater and very poor theater at best. Amazing that the useless idiots of the world actually bought this crap.
I’ll be speaking in LA on the Al Durah affair, especially on its effects, the day before the French court’s decision. The title is meant both Read More »
In his mea culpa, Shmuel Rosner talks about how he was one of the people I described as “attacking ferociously” the investigation set up by Yom Read More »
One of the more interesting spectacles that has arisen since the Kuperwasser Report has been the range of reaction, which pretty much separates the lethal journalists Read More »
Among the defenses of Enderlin’s Al Durah story comes from an organization that considers itself “Reporters without Borders,” a variant of “Doctors without Borders,” and a Read More »
Al Neuman: What in the hell is wrong with these Ha'aretz peop
»
mika.: Nothing to see here, move along slave.
http://y
»
w.w.wygart: I've done a little checking [a little], Bruno Stev
»
[...] Zona InGame :: Noticias, videos, juegos y actualidad de PlayStation 3, Wii, Xbox360, Pc wrote an interesting post today on France2 Rushes (18 Minutes Version) Now Up at YouTubeHere’s a quick excerptLots to see, even thought they cut out at least three of the most obvious fake scenes. [...]
And the Outstanding Supporting Actor award goes to the “Uh, oh never mind, my leg’s not hurt that bad” kid in the striped shirt at TCR 01:58:15:12
I’m still trying to figure out what the purpose of the burning tire was at TCR 01:07:15:12.
One of the most striking things about this scene is utter lack of purpose. All of these lads are running around without direction, shrieking without sense, and throwing stones without target.
This is less political protest than mass hysteria.
These lads are by now adults. That bodes ill for any kind of rational future for their society.
Thanks, Richard. I’ve been waiting for this.
One of the things that one ought to wonder about is why the loving, devoted father is next to the wall, rather than the boy Muhammad next to the wall, if the father wants to protect him.
Another thing is why the father took the boy through that intersection where shooting and death were supposedly going on. If a whole large crowd was running around screaming, why couldn’t the father have gotten himself and the kid away from there if the other “youths” were able to get away? I recall hearing on the Israeli radio [Reshet Beyt] on the day of the alleged incident that the father was taking the boy to look at used cars that day. But why a route through such an ostensibly dangerous intersection??
By the way, one of the young men interviewed demonstrated once again that these Arabs see themselves as part of a larger Arab and Islamic identity. Towards the end of the first film, a fellow is interviewed in Arabic. I didn’t understand all of it, but I heard repeatedly refer to 1) sha`ab filastini, 2) al-sha`ab al-`Arabi [& al-ummah al-`Arabiyyah], and al-ummah al-Islamiyyah [or al-muslimiyyah]. No. 1 means the “palestinian people,” no. 2 means the Arab people [sha`ab] and the Arab nation [ummah], and no. 3 the Islamic nation or Muslim nation. So it is clear that he saw himself as part of the palestinian section of the Arab nation and the Islamic nation, concentric circles, as it were. But we ought to bear in mind that the Western MSM eat this stuff up, either because it fits their political program or because it fits their prejudices or both.
This is less political protest than mass hysteria. These lads are by now adults. That bodes ill for any kind of rational future for their society.
Yes, but apparently that does not prevent the west from interpretting it as protest and resistance. Their rationale is not to build themselves a society — they have no clue what that is and they dk how — it is is to fool the gullible idiots in the west and destroy israel’s.
oao
http://fallofknowledgeandreason.blogspot.com/
Another thing is why the father took the boy through that intersection where shooting and death were supposedly going on.
I assume this is a rhetorical question. For the arabs explicitly say that they are proud to send their children to die for allah killing jews, surely what al-Durah did was quite protective.
So it is clear that he saw himself as part of the palestinian section of the Arab nation and the Islamic nation, concentric circles, as it were.
What else, given that this is what they are fed since kindergarten 24 hours a day, to distract them from the real source of their misery?
But we ought to bear in mind that the Western MSM eat this stuff up, either because it fits their political program or because it fits their prejudices or both.
I reiterate: the west has decided to sacrifice the jews in order to sate rising islam. But they are only wheting its appetite.
I wish someone would translate what is being said on the screen.
I couldn’t help but notice that with all the supposed gunfire, nobody sought to take cover. I also assume that members of the IDF are fairly accurate shooters, then how come with so many available targets none of the demonstrators suffered a single gunshot wound? This was just theater and very poor theater at best. Amazing that the useless idiots of the world actually bought this crap.
Richard, was the trial judge made aware of the content of the cut scenes?