War is not the Answer? Depends on the Question.

While on the Cape last week, I saw a number of signs that read “War is not the Answer.” I had only recently brought up this bumper sticker with my students in order to illustrate the problems of liberal cognitive egocentrism: No culture has ever proposed such an idea, with the exception of some messianic groups. Those that have (and survive), live in exile (Jews after Bar Kochba, Tibetans). Indeed, it’s hard not to savor the irony of these well-intentioned folks, living peacefully on the land of the Wampanoags whose plague-decimated numbers were finally reduced to some 400, and completely subjugated by “King Phillip’s War.”

A visit to the sponsoring site of this pacifist sign reveals that it is, indeed, a messianic pacifist group, the Quakers, who arose out of the messianic crucible of the 17th century English Civil War. They address the obvious question: “If war is not the answer, what is?

The practical instruments of negotiation, aid, and development assistance, the psychological instrument of respect for human dignity and equality, and the political instruments of human, juridical, and civil rights provide a more effective, just, and moral answer.

I agree with all of those “instruments” when they are practicable. But in the (hopefully rare) situation where they do not work, applying them actually backfires. Remember Gandhi’s famous non-violent resistance (suicidal) advice to the Jews when dealing with the Nazis — which, alas, too many instinctively followed. Such techniques only work when dealing with people who have a liberal conscience (like the British in India). When dealing with political cultures that seek dominion at any cost, such kindness registers as weakness and triggers aggression, not reconciliation.

Later today I will be on a committee examining a thesis on the failures of the US Intelligence Community in dealing with the “civilizational Jihad” of the Muslim Brotherhood against the United States. It is a staggering tale of political correctness that renders us dupes to demopaths who have learned to use every principle we treasure in order to dupe us into allowing them to flourish.

CAIR’s mission statement sought “to enhance understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.” This sounds wonderful, but is not the true intent of the organization. The reality is that this is another organization within the [Muslim] Brotherhood running a deception campaign. The Brothers’ real objectives are to use CAIR as an instrument to influence the United States by mounting a public relations campaign under the guise of a civil rights campaign. The Brothers know how to use words and issues in ways that Americans want to hear. In one of the documents there [in the material entered in evidence at the “Holy Land Foundation” trial] is reference to a dictionary of terms that will placate the American public.

If they ever need any help, going to the “Friends'” site will give them all the buzz-words they need.

While meditating on these issues, I ran across the following piece in the Jerusalem Post by Caleb ben-David, one of their more reflective writers. It illustrates the problems of “peace advocacy” in prime-divider cultures where violence — male violence, to be redundant — is a norm.

Apr 24, 2008 12:23 | Updated Apr 25, 2008 1:39
Snap Judgment: The last journey of Pippa Bacca

The killing earlier of this month of Giuseppina Pasqualino di Marineo, “Pippa Bacca,” has received little media comment outside the country of her birth, Italy, and that of her death, Turkey.

It should, though; Bacca was apparently a very special kind of “performance artist,” who saw her life, or at least the way she chose to live it, as her “brush,” and the whole world as her canvas. Tragically, the end of that life turned out not in the way she intended – nor left behind exactly the message that she had hoped it would convey.

Bacca, 33, set off from Milan last March together with fellow artist Silvia Moro on what they dubbed a “Brides on Tour” journey, with both wearing white wedding dresses and taking separate routes from Italy through southern Europe and the Middle East, with the intention of meeting up together at the end here in Jerusalem sometime this month.

The central point was to promote peace and faith in one’s fellow man, in part by doing the entire trip via hitchhiking. Although to many the idea of a single woman thumbing rides through some of the most conflict-ridden regions of the globe sounds more than a little naïve and dangerous, this apparently was the very point. The Web site they created for the “Brides on Tour” project declares: “Hitchhiking is choosing to have faith in other human beings, and man, like a small god, rewards those who have faith in him.”

Alas, on the way Bacca met a man who had a very different outlook, and in early April her corpse was discovered near the Turkish town of Gebze, southeast of Istanbul. Traced through his use of her cellphone, a local man was later arrested and confessed to her rape and murder shortly after he picked her up.

“We cannot blame all Turks for this incident,” Bacca’s mother told the Turkish press. “No one could have predicted my daughter would encounter such a maniac.”

Of course not – though a Western woman hitchhiking alone through the Turkish hinterlands surely must be aware of a very real element of risk.

I would be a little less understated in responding to this poor mother’s comment: “What are you talking about? Anyone with any knowledge of honor-shame, alpha-male behavior and its enormous power in cultures like that of Turkey could have predicted precisely this.” Of course, her sister, quoted in the NYT, anticipated my comment and refuted it:

    “Just read any newspaper — people get killed for playing music too loudly, and women get raped in the subway; there are fiends everywhere,” Ms. Pasqualino said. “This was not a question of Turkey or of religion.”

Not surprisingly, the comment was echoed by Turkish and Italian officials. And it may be true in some sense, although I do think the odds vary depending on the culture.

Bacca’s murder generated widespread revulsion in Turkey, sparking demonstrations by local women wearing placards declaring, “We are Pippa,” and demanding the government take greater steps to ensure that unaccompanied women in the streets are free from harassment.

This gets to an interesting tension within these cultures of male-dominance. Women generally live lives of quiet desperation. If Bacca’s murder were to give them voice, it would not have been in vain. But for that to happen, not only would these women need to speak up, but the international press would have to cover this story in its details and thereby shame Turkish officials into taking real measures.

Bacca’s artistic collaborator Moro, who cut short her own trip after her friend’s murder, told The New York Times she “still hoped to take to the road to finish the performance. Otherwise it would be a failure, and I don’t want the message to fail.”

“I am not disowning the project,” she added firmly. “This tragedy only highlights how difficult peaceful relations are and how much work there is still to do.”

This is classic messianic behavior in a state of cognitive dissonance. When your premise has been disproved, keep pursuing the goal, which is more important than reality testing.

INDEED. I sincerely hope Moro does carry on (with greater precaution) her and Bacca’s project, even the performance they were planning to stage in Tel Aviv at its end, when they were planning to ceremonially wash their wedding dresses.

Their journey, said Moro, was intended to show that “by overcoming differences and lowering the level of conflict individuals and cultures could come together… Meeting people was the key.”

But if their project is to retain its artistic integrity, it should honestly take into account Bacca’s tragic fate, and incorporate it into the work and the meaning it seeks to convey. And surely that message is that sometimes faith in fellow man and a desire for peace is not enough in this world; often it is wise, if not essential, to combine those elements with strong doses of hardheaded – and hearted – caution and concern, pragmatism and patience. If not, the end result may turn out to be not only failure, but violent failure that ends up defeating the very message of trust and peace the original effort was meant to convey.

Precisely. In other words, when one pursues peace only through negotiations when dealing with a bloody-minded foe, one ends up strengthening the very forces one hopes to overcome. PCP strengthens Jihad.

Strangely enough, I thought of Pippa Bacca this week while attending a press conference in Jerusalem featuring former US president Jimmy Carter discussing his own recent travels and encounters in the region, with the likes of Syrian President Bashar Assad and Hamas chief Khaled Mashaal.

This was performance art of its own kind – “ex-president on tour” – that was also all about promoting peace in the region. Again, meeting people was key, as was giving them the benefit of the doubt and taking them at their word, even when in contradiction to good sense. Fortunately for Carter, the conditions under which he traveled virtually guaranteed a safe final arrival in Jerusalem to close his trip.

If I am inclined under these circumstances to be far more generous to Bacca’s wanderings, it is in the certainty that at least in her case there is no doubt her motives were entirely good-hearted, and that the only possible harmful outcome of her trip was to herself, which regrettably did come to pass.

Pippa Bacca was a dreamer – and yes, perhaps so is Jimmy Carter. Peace, of course, is always worth dreaming about. But the longer I live in this country, and this region, the more convinced I become that peace is not made by the dreamers, but the realists, especially weary and wary old warriors such as Menachem Begin, Anwar Sadat, Yitzhak Rabin, King Hussein, Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak.

Peace is not made by simply choosing to have faith in other people – which one should – but by taking reasonable precautions that if that faith is not rewarded, the end results will not be cruelly catastrophic. Though I appreciate her idealism, this to me is the real meaning of Pippa Bacca’s final journey.

12 Responses to War is not the Answer? Depends on the Question.

  1. David M says:

    The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the – Web Reconnaissance for 04/28/2008 A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often.

  2. Michael B says:

    “The practical instruments of negotiation, aid, and development assistance, the psychological instrument of respect for human dignity and equality, and the political instruments of human, juridical, and civil rights provide a more effective, just, and moral answer.”

    Proving that the opposite of cynicism is something on the order of a willfully naive fabulism.

    Likewise, Jimmy Carter is no simple lover of peace in any real-world, genuinely conceived and probative sense. A review of Carter’s storied relations with Fidel’s Cuba, North Korea, Serbia’s Milosevic – not to mention his even more corrupting and contorting influence in the M.E. – all belie such a vastly overly generous notion.

  3. oao says:

    carter has made it clear why he always selects dictators to deal with: they “speak for all the people” and therefore it is easier for him to strike deals. this, from a man who claims the highest level of morality.

    he cannot perform the same “miracles” in democracies because they are unlike dictators who treat him for the useful idiot that he is — mesh’al was an excellent example.

    without arab funds he would have been nobody, not the self-important ass that he is. the sheer fact that out of all the real human tragedies in this world — most of which are perpetrated by the arabs/muslims — he chooses to ignore practically all of them and focus on israel and echo the propaganda of his paymasters says about it all. and so does the dhimmicrats’ selection of him to deliver the keynote speech at their convention.

    before you know it they’ll ask wright to keynote.


  4. Punditarian says:

    Although there may be no culture that believes war is the answer, in more than a few cultures, warfare is seen as an honorable and desirable way of life.

    The troubadour Bertran de Born wrote a vivid poem celebrating the glories of war.

    And in Islam, despite what p.c. commentators and practitioners of taqqiya want us to think, war is a sacrament.

    The Bedouin warriors of the Cyrenaica told Evans-Pritchard, when he asked what they did to make them think they were good Muslims (since he never saw them pray, etc), told him “We fast and we fight.”

    I think that warfare is an honorable activity, and that the profession of arms is an honorable profession. It is the peace that is created by the warrior which enables all of the other professions and arts to be practiced.

    I am thinking that the freedom of the Italian cities, for example, to develop a mercantile economy out of which the free market of capitalism might eventually emerge, was the product of the peace and freedom won for them by condotierri such as Colleoni.

    And so on.

  5. Eliyahu says:

    off topic//
    Our stalwart Richard Landes has been slandered as a “falsifier” [faussaire] in a Canal+ show and in a commentary on the show in L’Express, according to Menahem Macina’s site, Debriefing.org.

    P Karsenty is also so slandered, while charles enderlin is praised as an accurate reporter. This may be actionable for Richard.

  6. oao says:

    in an orwellian world in which lies are truth and truth is lies, what else could be expected?

    that’s what one gets when trying to go against it. force people to face inconvenient truths and that’s what you get. i’ve been doing it for more than two decades in my area of expertise and I paid the price.

    there is no substitute for the west to fall and pay its price for letting knowledge and reason collapse.

  7. […] der andere Lösungen verfolgenden in die Hölle schickt. Wie das aussieht, wieso das so ist, hat Richard Landes in seiner Einleitung zum Kommentar eines Artikels aus der Jerusalem Post ausführlich erläutert […]

  8. BDE says:

    Landes is just another small minded bigot masquerading as a progressive intellectual. All sycophants of his should be ashamed.

  9. […] to the dominating imperative and the prime divider are always a possibility, violence can never be taken “off the table” no matter how “strong” we are economically, no matter how much we prefer peaceful […]

  10. […] well-intentioned, inane claims to the effect that “war doesn’t change anything” and that “war isn’t the answer,” that we all need to “give peace a chance.” Who among us would not love to live in such a […]

  11. […] (really messianic) notion that it should be repealed among all nations, as the meme goes “War is not the answer.” In the massive “peace/anti-war” demonstrations of 2003, the idea spread that […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *