-
-
Lethal Journalism at Work: Omar Mishrawi’s Death and the Press
May 26, 2013 By Richard LandesBackground: During Operation Pillar of Defense (Amud Anan) in November of 2012, one photo of the BBC’s operative in Gaza, Jihad Mishrawi crying to the heavens Read More » -
How Dare You Deprive us of our Icon of Hatred? A Saudi Writer on Al Durah
May 26, 2013 By Richard LandesThe Kuperwasser Committee Report on Al Durah has elicited fascinating and revealing responses. This one from Saudi Arabia permits us to appreciate just how important a Read More » -
Derfner’s Brand of Kool-Aid: You Gonna Believe me or your Lying Eyes?
May 24, 2013 By Richard LandesReally didn’t want to do this. Have responded thrice in the Spring of 2008 to Dernfer’s rattling his cage about Al Durah – here, here, and Read More » -
Welcome, Refugee from rekaB Street: Shmuel Rosner’s Mea Culpa
May 23, 2013 By Richard LandesIn the flood of commentary and analysis of the Al Durah controversy, I’ve tried to fisk the most important typical responses. And of course, I have Read More » -
Enderlin: “What would they say in Gaza if I didn’t report that the Israelis killed him?”
May 23, 2013 By Richard LandesOne of the more scandalous episodes of the Al Durah Affair came about after the judges saw the rushes and Karsenty won his appeal, much to Read More »
-
-
James the Just, Brother of Jesus: Fake, but accurate. That seems to be the defense. »
-
-
Richard Landes: Mika, i'm not sure who Richard is in your sentence »
-
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Heaven On Earth



[...] Originally posted here [...]
The Reds haven’t gotten any better than they were in the good old Soviet days. I recall a shot where they airbrushed out someone who had been purged – I can’t remember his name but I think it might have been Lieberman – but they forgot to remove his shoes. Even with Photoshop they still can’t get it right.
Did he have an heir? Or has Pajama boy been playing with the starlets so much he never took time to see to the matter of succession?
I intentionally use the language of feudal kingdoms here because that is what Communist regimes are.
Or there are other explanations:
> The shadow cast by Kim Jong Il’s legs does not
> match that of the officers.
Eh, don’t forget, that he is above the laws of nature. Can you prove that he doesn’t bend the light in this case?
> The black line running behind the legs of the
> officers disappears when it approaches the legs
> of the dictator.
You obviously don’t understand these people’ ability to change their environment for the better. (Unfortunately, I am not…) Haven’t you realized that the Dear Leader is so perfect that even the black whitens around him? You clearly didn’t live in a communist country so you don’t know what these Double Gods are capable of.
> Mismatched pixels are visible to the right of
> Jong Il’s left foot, suggesting two photos
> were poorly spliced together.
My God, my God. Don’t you realize that the Dear Leader is so bright that his brightness just shines on his shoes? Remember, he is the guiding light in the Universe. Don’t forget, that when this Double God was born, there was a double rainbow (plural, or singular?). Obviously, he can recreate those rainbows, and they are just illuminating his shoes.
OK, some more observations.
1. According to the shadows of the legs, the Dear Leader stands a bit behind of the other two guys in the front row. But if you look at the upper bodies, then he stands a bit in front of their line. is he about just falling like a tree trunk? (Anybody remembers the very funny video where Fidel falls flat on his face?)
2. Concentrate on the guy who is standing on the right of the Dear Leader (left on the picture). His head’s shadow is visible on the guy in the second row. But the shape of his hat doesn’t match that of the shadow. In comparison, the guy on the Dear Leader’s other side has a consistent hat and hat-shadow.
3. Again, the guy with the inconsistent hat/shadow. Look at the color of his face. It is a bit dull. Now look the Dear Leader, and the other front-line guy’s face. It is clear that the sun shines on their faces.
I wouldn’t be surprised, if the inconsistent guy was also faked.
Vilmos
That photo wasn’t faked, according to one expert.
http://www.sciam.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=did-north-korea-fake-photos-of-kim-2008-11-10
That of course doesn’t prove that the Dear Leader is healthy, or that the photo isn’t old.
The banner in the photo, by the way, says, “Let’s dedicate our lives to safeguarding our great leader and comrade Kim and his top revolutionary leaders.”
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jTZ_AGY3NA3E1aLdohHKfeA7PnqgD948NIAO0
The line I can’t explain but the shadows can be…
The uniforms are bulky and the soldiers appear to be a bit bowlegged where Kims legs are straight as an arrow. Because this shot is nearly straight on, we can’t see how much the pants legs tapper to the ankle from the front. Facial shadows and shadows on the upper garments appear to be similar. The only thing that MAY have happened is they made him taller. Nothing in the original makes me believe it was doctored.
Just as with the supposed faked moon photographs, shadows CAN appear to run at different angles when shot with the same light source and the “faked” shots were debunked by Mythbusters and shown that it can happen. Depends on terrain. Is the material behind Kim angled sligtly to make the shadows appear to be different? Cant be judged from that photo.
This is where the Conspiracy theorists are laughed at….see this photo: http://res.heraldm.com/content/image/2010/10/06/20101006001257_0.jpg
Same black line missing. Different clothes on everybody…here’s what I think…it’s not uncommon to have an area made to be identifiable from a distance so they dont look silly trying to find where they are to stand. Could also be an area designated where NOT to stand if you’re NOT Kim. Another possibility that people miss because they’re NOT an evil dictator…that whole section COULD be bullet proofed so anybody BEHIND the bleachers can’t shoot through it. This can be put to bed…it’s not a doctored photo.
His image was enlarged and then photo-shopped to look taller than he really is!!! this man is really ridiculous…probably he has a … also SHORT! :D