Bill Moyers Update: An Exchange with Abe Foxman

Here’s from Moyers’ site:

Following Bill Moyers’ reflections on the events in Gaza on the JOURNAL last week, Anti-Defamation League National Director Abraham Foxman sent him this letter:

Mr. Moyers,

In less than a thousand words, you managed to fit into your January 9 commentary: (1) moral equivalency between Hamas, a radical Islamic terrorist group whose anti-Semitic charter cites the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East and perhaps America’s greatest ally in the world; (2) historical revisionism, asserting that Canaanites were Arabs; (3) anti-Semitism, declaring that Jews are “genetically coded” for violence; (4) ignorance of the terrorist threat against Israel, claiming that checkpoints, the security fence, and the Gaza operation are tactics of humiliation rather than counter-terrorism; and (5) promotion of an individual, the Norwegian doctor in Gaza, who has publicly expressed support for the September 11 attacks.

I have seen and read serious critiques of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, and I have disagreed with many of them. Your commentary, however, is different, consisting mostly of intellectually and morally faulty claims that do a great disservice to the PBS audience. It invites not disagreement, but rebuke.

On one point you are correct – “America has officially chosen sides.” And rightly so. Fortunately for our nation, very few of our citizens engage in the same moral equivalency, racism, historical revisionism, and indifference to terrorism as you. If the reverse held, it would not be a country that any decent person would want to live in.

Sincerely,

Abraham H. Foxman
National Director
Anti-Defamation League

In response, Bill Moyers sent Mr. Foxman the following message:

Dear Mr. Foxman:

You made several errors in your letter to me of January 13 and I am writing to correct them.

First, to call someone a racist for lamenting the slaughter of civilians by the Israeli military offensive in Gaza is a slur unworthy of the tragedy unfolding there. Your resort to such a tactic is reprehensible.

Earlier this week it was widely reported that the International Red Cross “was so outraged it broke its usual silence over an attack in which the Israeli army herded a Palestinian family into a building and then shelled it, killing 30 people and leaving the surviving children clinging to the bodies of their dead mothers. The army prevented rescuers from reaching the survivors for four days.”

When American troops committed a similar atrocity in Vietnam, it was called My Lai and Lt. Calley went to prison for it. As the publisher of a large newspaper at the time, I instructed our editorial staff to cover the atrocity fully because Americans should know what our military was doing in our name and with our funding. To say “my country right or wrong” is like saying “my mother drunk or sober.” Patriots owe their country more than that, whether their government and their taxes are supporting atrocities in Vietnam, Iraq, or, in this case, Gaza.

Contrary to your claim, I made no reference whatsoever to “moral equivalency” between Hamas and Israel. That is an old canard often resorted to by propagandists trying to divert attention from facts on the ground, and, it, too, is unworthy of the slaughter in Gaza. Contrary to imputing “moral equivalency” between Hamas and Israel, I said that “Hamas would like to see every Jew in Israel dead.” I said that “a radical stream of Islam now seeks to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth.” And I described the new spate of anti-Semitism across the continent of Europe. I am curious as to why you ignored remarks which clearly counter the notion of “moral equivalency.”

And although I specifically referred to “the rockets from Hamas” falling on Israel and said that “every nation has the right to defend itself, and Israel is no exception,” you nonetheless accuse me of “ignorance of the terrorist threat against Israel.” Once again, you are quite selective in your reading of my essay.

Your claim that “the checkpoints, the security fence and the Gaza operation” [I used the more accurate “onslaught”] are not humiliating of the Palestinians is lamentable. I did not claim that these were, as you write, “tactics of humiliation rather [emphasis mine] than counter-terrorism,” but perhaps it is overly simplistic to think they are one and not the other, when they are both. Also lamentable is your description of my “promotion” of the Norwegian doctor in Gaza when in fact I was simply quoting what he told CBS News: “It’s like Dante’s Inferno. They are bombing one and a half million people in a cage.” The whole world has been able to see for itself what he was talking about, and as one major news organization after another has been reporting, is reeling from the sight.

And, to your claim that I was “declaring Jews are ‘genetically coded’ for violence,” you are mistaken. My comment – obviously not sufficiently precise – was not directed at a specific people but to the fact that the human race has violence in its DNA, as the biblical stories so strongly affirm. I also had in mind the relationship between all the descendents of Abraham who love the same biblical land and come to such grief over it.

From my days in President Johnson’s White House forward, I have defended Israel’s right to defend itself, and still do. But sometimes an honest critic is a government’s best friend, and I am appalled by Israel’s devastation of innocent civilians in this battle, all the more so because, as I said in my column, it is exactly what Hamas wanted to happen. To be so indifferent to that suffering is, sadly, to be as blind in Gaza as Samson.

Sincerely,

Bill Moyers

The comments are fairly terrifying.

7 Responses to Bill Moyers Update: An Exchange with Abe Foxman

  1. oao says:

    another dummy dhimmi like carter. there is nothing more pathetic than religious ignorants who express their true beliefs when they see it’s fashionable.

    we saw a similar example with erdogan, the “moderate” muslim. when push came to show he could not abstain from exposing his islamism and jew-hatred.

  2. Ari says:

    I’ve seen several reports on Red Cross personnel finding children next to their mothers’ corpses, but haven’t seen the allegation that the IDF first herded the family into the house and then shelled it. Nor did I see the figure of 30 dead in the incident. Anyone know what he’s talking about? Have a reference?

  3. Eliyahu says:

    If Moyers were sincere in his pretended concern for civilian casualties in war, he would have gone back to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the firebombing of Tokyo by the US, and to the bombings of Dresden and Hamburg by the British, if I recall rightly. Very very few American civilians died in WW2 at either Japanese or German hands. Yet many Japanese and German civilians died. So the whole goody goody quasi-pacifist argument coming from Lyndon Johnson’s press advisor stinks like a sewer. Not to mention the numbers game [so many more Arab civilians killed.]

    Does moyers recall that in the 1964 presidential election, Johnson was the “peace candidate,” just as today obama is the “change & hope” president-elect. Moyers ought to remember that a few weeks after LBJ won the 1964 election by a large margin as the “peace candidate,” the massive bombing of North Vietnam began [after the Tonkin Gulf incident]. He was not too repelled at that time to serve Johnson. LBJ’s massive destruction policy does not seem to have bothered him in the least, though he does mention a small fry like Lt. Calley.

    Further, I consider it a sign of moral turpitude to take UN [esp. UNRWA] and Red Cross [ICRC] claims at face value. Moyers is not stupid, so if he pretends to accept the truth of a UNRWA claim, then he is disingenuous at best.

  4. Ruth says:

    Ari,

    I have looked into this story. It is based completely on Palestinian hearsay as even Al Jazeera acknowledges:
    http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/01/200919135323309745.html
    BBC also brings the Israel dementi. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7819492.stm
    There were no Israeli troops in Beit Zeitoun when this incident happened. The most probable explanation is that the house was mined by Hamas and Palestinian civilians who fled to this house triggered the explosion. That Hamas and their propaganda units would then try and blame it on Israel is to be expected.

  5. Monday links…

    More snow yesterday and last night. This has been a wonderful winter thus far, cold and snowy, and cozy indoors.
    16 things it took me 50 years to learn. Dave Barry
    Are new jobs "stimulating"?
    Jules needs a new system if he is going to cont…

  6. [...] defense of his rant against Israel for its assault on innocent Palestinian civilians, Bill Moyers cited an incident that allegedly occurred in the Zeitun neighborhood of Gaza City on January 4-5. For anyone familiar [...]

  7. oao says:

    Moyers is not stupid, so if he pretends to accept the truth of a UNRWA claim, then he is disingenuous at best.

    i don’t think he is very smart either, particularly when it comes to analysis based on EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE.
    he is more of an anti-american/capitalism ideologue and he knows enough about america to often make reasonable arguments. however, when it comes to knowledge and understanding of foreign cultures and events, he is just like chomsky and carter: he does not have a clue. so then he relies on his distrust of america, emotions and religion.

    to that effect the pals propaganda fit in beautifully.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>