-
-
Derfner’s Brand of Kool-Aid: You Gonna Believe me or your Lying Eyes?
May 24, 2013 By Richard LandesReally didn’t want to do this. Have responded thrice in the Spring of 2008 to Dernfer’s rattling his cage about Al Durah – here, here, and Read More » -
Welcome, Refugee from rekaB Street: Shmuel Rosner’s Mea Culpa
May 23, 2013 By Richard LandesIn the flood of commentary and analysis of the Al Durah controversy, I’ve tried to fisk the most important typical responses. And of course, I have Read More » -
Enderlin: “What would they say in Gaza if I didn’t report that the Israelis killed him?”
May 23, 2013 By Richard LandesOne of the more scandalous episodes of the Al Durah Affair came about after the judges saw the rushes and Karsenty won his appeal, much to Read More » -
Lethal Journalists React to the Al Durah Report: Insights into the NGO-Journo Matrix
May 23, 2013 By Richard LandesIt’s well known here in Israel that the journalists, the NGOs and the UN folk party together, that within a few weeks of coming to the Read More » -
Answer to Vic Rosenthal’s Good Question about Al Durah
May 23, 2013 By Richard LandesSubtitle to Why was the IDF (and Karsenty) Abandoned in the Al Dura Affair? Why didn’t then Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz and then Prime Minister Ehud Read More »
-
-
James the Just, Brother of Jesus: Fake, but accurate. That seems to be the defense. »
-
-
Richard Landes: Mika, i'm not sure who Richard is in your sentence »
-
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Heaven On Earth


B’Tselem’s mission is not to report on anything but Israeli crimes, true or alleged. How embarrassing for them to find out they didn’t check well enough their collaborator’s background… He might have ended up denouncing them!
b’tselem will just quietly designate him a human rights shaheed who died for the cause. no need to mention him because he’s already enjoying his reward in the human rights afterlife, satisfying the NGO gods’ system of eternal justice (which might appear as one-sided to some of us mere mortals).
it is a shame that an organization so obsessed with “justice” cannot (i mean, WILL NOT) stand up for its own fundamental principles, especially when it comes to itself. talk about self-loathing…
Something is very wrong in the world.
“B’Tselem” is Hebrew for “In the Image” but they don’t say “In the Image” of what. I’d say “In the Image of Satan”
Haider Ghanem could well have been someone who fell from grace with B’tselem mgmt. Perhaps he wasn’t sufficiently biased against Israel. In any case, B’tselem’s silence is probably because they turned him in. What better way to curry favor with your overlords while getting rid of an undesirable – while sending a message to any troops who might be similarly inclined?
How embarrassing for them to find out they didn’t check well enough their collaborator’s background…
It’s MUCH MORE than embarassing. If you are a believer — read Eric Hoffer — with your identity wrapped up in that belief and reality slaps you in the face, the cognitive dissonance must be unbearable. it makes you even more of a hater of israel, you MUST prove even more that they are huge monsters.
similar to the MSM journos whose cowardice induces rage against israel: why doesn’t israel behave in accordance to their lies, so that they would not be lying and, therefore, not cowards.
Over at the NYTimes Week In Review Section it’s a doubleheader of cognitive egocentrism:
“The Bullets in My In-Box” by Ethan Bronner (Everybody is pissed-off at me so I must be an objective journalist). The article should have been titled: “Clueless”.
And an Op-Ed by professors Scott Atran and Jeremy Ginges.
How Words Could End a War. (If we can get them to apologize, kiss, and make-up).
oao,
Why, I expect B’Tselem to update, within the next 24 hours, their definition of collateral damage. Don’t you?
Festinger would.
See muqata.blogspot.com for another example of pallywood.
I think it more likely that Ghanam was executed BECAUSE he had worked for B’tselem. Remember, B’tselem is an Israeli institution, even though it’s hostile to the Zionist vision. In post-war purges where loyalties are in doubt and due process is non-existent, that might be enough to sign one’s warrant.
This might also explain B’tselem’s silence on the subject; the murder of a staffer as a Zionist collaborator could damage their “street cred” with European leftists and Islamist apologists. Why call attention to that?
Or maybe they’re afraid that releasing such news will give license to other groups to single out and kill B’Tselem members? They might think if they say nothing, they’ll be allowed to continue to work as they have been.
Or maybe even the killing was just a warning to B’Tselem, just on principles, making sure they don’t feel ‘uppity’ when Hamas is at a low point.