-
-
Landes, “Save the Children of Palestine”: Talk in LA on Al Durah
June 18, 2013 By Richard LandesI’ll be speaking in LA on the Al Durah affair, especially on its effects, the day before the French court’s decision. The title is meant both Read More » -
Haaretz to the world: “Us? Make an Error? The Day of Resurrection will come first!”
May 28, 2013 By Richard LandesIn his mea culpa, Shmuel Rosner talks about how he was one of the people I described as “attacking ferociously” the investigation set up by Yom Read More » -
The Place of Journalism in Palestinian Cognitive Warfare (Talk at AIS, Haifa, June 2012)
May 28, 2013 By Richard Landes[I thought I had posted this last year when I gave it, but find I haven't. So here it is, particularly relevant in light of the Read More » -
Al Durah (Lethal) Journalism Thrives at Open Zion: Al Durah Incited Hatred? Absurd!
May 27, 2013 By Richard LandesOne of the more interesting spectacles that has arisen since the Kuperwasser Report has been the range of reaction, which pretty much separates the lethal journalists Read More » -
Reporters Without Borders Comes to Enderlin’s Aid: The Smear Defense
May 26, 2013 By Richard LandesAmong the defenses of Enderlin’s Al Durah story comes from an organization that considers itself “Reporters without Borders,” a variant of “Doctors without Borders,” and a Read More »
-
-
-
w.w.wygart: I've done a little checking [a little], Bruno Stev »
-
Dionissis Mitropoulos: @ Wygart I don't know who this Stevens is, but »
-
w.w.wygart: Prof. Landes, what do you make of Bruno Stevens st »
-
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Heaven On Earth



Snopes says it’s a fake
ouch. doubly ironic. this guy sent me some other stuff that snopes said was fake. i shd have checked.
But Judy Klinghoffer reports that BP had the worst or one of the worst safety records among the oil majors, while at the same time playing up to the “ecology” and tree-hugging crowd and winning their sympathy as an oil company that was looking for sustainable replacements for petroleum.
I’ve been following the oil spill here at the direct undersea feeds.
http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=9033572&contentId=7062605
As an engineer on drilling rigs in a previous lifetime, my response to what BP did on the day that the well blew out was what were these idiots thinking? BP made decisions based on bean counting, not on engineering. It was no accident that the Transocean people had profound disagreements with BP that day, and that they based their disagreement on BP’s previous plans.
Gringo, thanks for some professional insight. As a non-professional in this field, it seems to me that BP was egregiously responsible for what happened back in April [what you say supports what Judy Klinghoffer said about BP recklessness about safety]. But once the disaster happened then it was the Federal govt’s problem too, that is, Obama’s problem. And it seems that he didn’t do much concrete to help the situation, to save the environment of the bayous [his followers' oh so precious environment], to stop the leak and the flow of oil to the shore. So he too is responsible. It seems to me –tell me if I’m wrong– that the Feds could have done a lot to prevent some of the environmental damage that has already taken place. Naturally, Obama and his gang blame BP, while for weeks they seem to have mainly sat back and watched.
Is this a reasonable view of what happened?